Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
PPI Consulting Limited (PPI) was engaged by Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) on October12,2012 as the Fairness Monitor (FM) contractor to observe the procurement process related to PSPC's acquisition of Support Services for the Department of National Defence (DND)'s Defence Resource Management Information System (DRMIS) and PSPC's SIGMA System.
The FM reviewed the assessment of financial proposals and confirms that the process was conducted appropriately in accordance with the process established in the RFP and in a fair, open and transparent manner.
About this site
Evaluation training was provided to all evaluators. This included informing evaluators of the following: Easy to install into any vehicle, the core technology was developed by the University of Tokyo, with further development carried out by JIP Techno Science Corporation and Waterman Group’s holding company CTI Engineering. The system is widely used for road maintenance in Japan, and CTI Engineering has been leading the introduction to projects overseas.
Each evaluator conducted his/her own independent review and scoring of the proposal in his/her evaluator workbook The PSPC individual assigned to complete the assessment of financial proposals reviewed and verified the financial proposal of each bid. The individual verified that each financial proposal was complete and complied with the requirements of the RFP. With over two decades in the highways sector, his extensive portfolio is punctuated by success and innovation across the UK and Europe, including the UK’s first LED Road Safety and Wireless Vehicle Detection trial. PSPC continues to identify opportunities that would allow the Department and the Government of Canada (GC) to realize maximum benefit from its ERP platform. 3. Attestation of assurancePrior to joining Waterman, John was Head of Business Development for Gaist Solutions, where he worked with local authorities to develop strategic planning and development improvements. The scoring assessment was applied consistently and equitably by the evaluation team with no evidence of bias All four proposals were deemed to have met the technical bid requirements of the RFP. The FM had no fairness concerns related to the technical bid evaluation. 4.2.4. Financial proposal assessment
Great Deal 
New Comment